[ticker-dev] ticker-3.0 spec
Ian Lister
ilister at dstc.edu.au
Mon Apr 8 09:50:38 EST 2002
On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, David Arnold wrote:
> i'd prefer that we specified a mechanism for secure chat. i'm
> happy to leave key exchange out. i think there are two competing
> proposals now (aquatik and jinx?)
I think Jinx now uses more or less identical logic to psst and the patches
to XTickertape (bug #515). This can support keys used in any number of
ways (e.g. per-user, per-channel, per-orgunit, etc), which is a superset
of Aquatik's per-channel keys. I've been slack recently but I intend to
renew pressure on Michael to adopt the more flexible logic, unless anybody
can see any problems with it.
Ian
More information about the ticker-dev
mailing list