[ticker-dev] ticker-3.0 spec

Ian Lister ilister at dstc.edu.au
Mon Apr 8 09:50:38 EST 2002


On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, David Arnold wrote:
>   i'd prefer that we specified a mechanism for secure chat.  i'm
>   happy to leave key exchange out.  i think there are two competing
>   proposals now (aquatik and jinx?)

I think Jinx now uses more or less identical logic to psst and the patches
to XTickertape (bug #515). This can support keys used in any number of
ways (e.g. per-user, per-channel, per-orgunit, etc), which is a superset
of Aquatik's per-channel keys. I've been slack recently but I intend to
renew pressure on Michael to adopt the more flexible logic, unless anybody
can see any problems with it.

Ian






More information about the ticker-dev mailing list